🔗 Share this article

Avril Coleridge-Taylor continually experienced the pressure of her family legacy. Being the child of the celebrated composer Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, a leading the best-known UK musicians of the early 20th century, the composer’s identity was shrouded in the lingering obscurity of bygone eras.

An Inaugural Recording

Earlier this year, I reflected on these legacies as I made arrangements to produce the first-ever recording of the composer’s piano concerto from 1936. Featuring intense musical themes, expressive melodies, and valiant rhythms, Avril’s work will offer new listeners fascinating insight into how she – a composer during war who entered the world in 1903 – imagined her world as a artist with mixed heritage.

Shadows and Truth

Yet about the past. It requires time to acclimate, to recognize outlines as they actually appear, to separate fact from misrepresentation, and I felt hesitant to face Avril’s past for a while.

I deeply hoped Avril to be following in her father’s footsteps. In some ways, that held. The rustic British sounds of parental inspiration can be detected in many of her works, such as From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). But you only have to look at the headings of her father’s compositions to understand how he identified as not just a champion of UK romantic tradition as well as a advocate of the African diaspora.

It was here that parent and child began to differ.

White America evaluated Samuel by the mastery of his art as opposed to the his ethnicity.

Samuel’s African Roots

During his studies at the renowned institution, her father – the son of a Sierra Leonean father and a British mother – began embracing his African roots. When the African American poet Paul Laurence Dunbar visited the UK in the late 19th century, the 21-year-old composer was keen to meet him. He adapted Dunbar’s African Romances as a composition and the next year incorporated his poetry for a musical work, Dream Lovers. This was followed by the choral work that made him famous: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Based on Henry Wadsworth Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, this composition was an international hit, particularly among the Black community who felt shared pride as the majority evaluated the composer by the quality of his art instead of the colour of his skin.

Principles and Actions

Recognition did not reduce his activism. At the turn of the century, he attended the First Pan African Conference in London where he met the Black American thinker WEB Du Bois and observed a series of speeches, covering the oppression of African people in South Africa. He was a campaigner until the end. He sustained relationships with pioneers of civil rights such as this intellectual and the educator Washington, gave addresses on ending discrimination, and even discussed issues of racism with the US President during an invitation to the White House in the early 1900s. In terms of his art, the scholar reflected, “he wrote his name so notably as a musician that it will endure.” He passed away in that year, aged 37. But what would Samuel have reacted to his daughter’s decision to be in the African nation in the that decade?

Issues and Stance

“Daughter of Famous Composer gives OK to apartheid system,” declared a title in the Black American publication Jet magazine. This policy “struck me as the correct approach”, she informed Jet. When pushed to clarify, she revised her statement: she didn’t agree with the system “fundamentally” and it “ought to be permitted to work itself out, overseen by good-intentioned South Africans of all races”. Were the composer more attuned to her family’s principles, or born in Jim Crow America, she could have hesitated about this system. Yet her life had protected her.

Background and Inexperience

“I hold a English document,” she stated, “and the government agents never asked me about my background.” So, with her “fair” complexion (as described), she moved alongside white society, buoyed up by their praise for her late father. She delivered a lecture about her family’s work at the University of Cape Town and led the South African Broadcasting Corporation Orchestra in the city, featuring the inspiring part of her Piano Concerto, subtitled: “In memory of my Father.” Although a confident pianist personally, she did not perform as the featured artist in her piece. Rather, she consistently conducted as the conductor; and so the segregated ensemble performed under her direction.

Avril hoped, according to her, she “could introduce a change”. However, by that year, things fell apart. After authorities discovered her mixed background, she was forced to leave the land. Her UK document didn’t protect her, the British high commissioner urged her to go or risk imprisonment. She came home, deeply ashamed as the magnitude of her naivety was realized. “This experience was a hard one,” she lamented. Adding to her humiliation was the 1955 publication of her controversial discussion, a year after her unceremonious exit from South Africa.

A Common Narrative

Upon contemplating with these memories, I perceived a recurring theme. The story of identifying as British until you’re not – that brings to mind troops of color who defended the British in the World War II and lived only to be refused rightful benefits. Including those from Windrush,